Truax Airman takes concerns to House

Staff Sgt. Weston Chadwick, 115th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, stands behind Lt. Gen. Harry Wyatt, the Director of the Air National Guard, at an Armed Services House Committee that addressed the Air Sovereignty Alert Mission. (Photo: Courtesy)

Staff Sgt. Weston Chadwick, 115th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, stands behind Lt. Gen. Harry Wyatt, the Director of the Air National Guard, at an Armed Services House Committee that addressed the Air Sovereignty Alert Mission. (Photo: Courtesy)

MADISON, Wis. -- In April I was sent to Washington D.C. for a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Air Sovereignty Alert operations. The hearing was prompted by a January 2009 General Accountability Office report on Homeland Defense. 

I met with Lt. Gen. Harry Wyatt, Director of the Air National Guard in his office at the Pentagon. The Pentagon was not what I expected it to be. The attitude was much more relaxed than what you see in the movies. In preparation for the hearing, we talked about some of the issues that ASA units are faced with. These issues include personnel, funding, dual tasking ASA and Air Expeditionary Force and aircraft life expectancy. 

My purpose at the hearing was to put a face with the story of issues encountered by ASA units. There is a significant difference between stating you have personnel issues and telling stories of exactly how personnel are affected by these issues. As many people know, the F-16s currently in use by the Air National Guard are slated for retirement within eight years. This dilemma will hinder not only the ASA mission but also the AEF cycles due to the dual tasking of ASA units. Currently, a formal plan to mitigate personnel and equipment shortages experienced by ASA units during their AEF rotations does not exist. 

Wing Commanders are more or less left to work with one another to cover the gaps. Funding is also an issue because the ASA mission is not funded as a steady state mission. Instead funding is issued in two year increments through appropriations or otherwise. Due to the instability in funding, turnover of personnel is considerably high. Some commanders say they lose their most experienced technicians because of instability. 

Neither General Wyatt nor I knew what to expect at the hearing. I was really nervous at first because I wasn't sure what types of questions were going to be asked of me. Originally I was to sit at the left of the general, luckily there weren't enough seats so I sat behind him instead. Because I didn't sit at the witness table I wasn't directly asked any questions. 

The hearing went well, and all involved agencies seem to be on the same page. The experience was an eye opener because I was able to see the problems we deal with here at Truax being addressed at the national level. General Wyatt spoke very adamantly about the need to include the ANG concurrently and proportionally in the aircraft recapitalization of the Air Force. This recapitalization would not be competitive with the Air Force because of the ANG's AEF rotations. Other possible solutions brought forth by committee members are the purchase of new F-16s or F-18s. These solutions were attractive because production lines are already in place, and the cost is less than 5th generation aircraft. Congressman Forbes of Virginia pointed out that in the past cost has driven strategy, and that because of the importance of the ASA mission perhaps strategy needed to drive cost. 

Something brought up by the Department of Defense representative is that the ASA mission is not an ANG mission, but a DOD mission. While the ANG currently provides ASA support at 16 of 18 sites, the DOD can use whichever assets from which ever service it deems necessary. With this in mind, and the impending "age out" of the ANG fighter force the possibility of other services being called upon to perform the ASA mission does exist. However, with the cost effectiveness the ANG has demonstrated it's hard to imagine the ANG not being included in future ASA operations. 

Congressman LoBiondo of New Jersey expressed concern that ASA is not in the mission statements of ANG units. It is for this reason why the dual tasking of ASA/AEF and manpower shortages surfaced as problems. He proposed that units performing ASA have it added to their mission statements. This would then help to get the funding and manpower required which would then alleviate many problems currently experienced by units performing ASA. 

Whichever actions the Air Force chooses to take with these problems, General Wyatt wants to ensure that the ANG is able to seamlessly integrate with the active duty force and whichever airframes it uses. The committee agreed that ASA needs to be funded as the number one mission of the DOD because homeland defense is the number one mission of this country. It will take time before we see results here at Truax, however it is reassuring to know that people in Washington are concerned and are willing to take action.
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.