HomeMediaArticle Display

Guard’s role in disaster response defined more clearly

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. -- Through an ongoing initiative between state governors and Department of Defense leadership, greater steps have been taken to further define the National Guard's role as the first military force to respond to emergencies and disaster situations, said Dave Heineman, governor of Nebraska, while addressing attendees at the 2012 Domestic Preparedness Workshop last week.

Known as the Unity of Effort, the initiative seeks to define the roles and responsibilities of the Guard, Active Duty and Reserve component forces should they all be needed as part of disaster response operations.

"For governors, Unity of Effort is really about partnerships and maintaining a clear chain of command so we can best serve our citizens in time of crisis," Heineman said.

One of the main outcomes of the initiative is that it clarifies that a Guard officer is to serve as a dual-status commander, maintaining command over both state forces - Guard elements - and federal military units that may also respond to an emergency or disaster situation occurring within the states.

"This document discusses the roles of governors and adjutant generals during a response and states that they are to be the principal support authority," said Heineman. "While this sounds simple, this phrase did form the basis for what has become an historic agreement that will dramatically change how this country prepares and responds to emergencies."

The plan has its roots in the response to Hurricane Katrina, said Heineman.

"Emergency response personnel from all across our country were called upon to assist, including 50,000 National Guard forces from every state and every territory," said Heineman. "As the floodwaters slowly receded and the country assessed what had occurred, some in the federal government decided that federalizing the response effort was the solution."

But, Heineman said, many others felt there was an alternative solution that answered the question of how to coordinate federal military forces with Guard elements in a disaster situation.

"It became very clear, in the very first meeting, that a dual-status commander in an emergency offered the best alternative to finding a solution to these challenges," said Heineman.

As a way to implement that, the Council of Governors was formed. Composed of 10 governors working on behalf of all the governors, the Council worked with the Department of Defense to develop a joint plan of action.

"The joint action plan lays out the plan forward for state and federal military forces to better coordinate their work," said Heineman. "At the end of the day, that's what it's all about."

The plan of action specifically addresses the role of the dual-status commander and - early in the drafting of the plan - a training and certification program was developed for those who may serve as a dual-status commander, Heineman said.

"The training program was operational within a year, and almost every state now has at least one National Guard officer trained to serve in this important role," Heineman said.

The plan of action has helped to solidify the working relationship between the state and federal governments.

"(It has) helped further establish trust between the governors and the Department of Defense and it is providing the foundation for a new, stronger partnership between state and federal military forces," Heineman said, referring to Unity of Effort as "the cornerstone for a successful emergency response effort."

But as a way to improve upon that cornerstone, Heineman said that both the adjutants general and the governors must maintain a solid dialogue on the Guard's capabilities within the state.

"You need to have a close personal relationship with your governor and you need to do it on days that your governor doesn't need to see you," Heineman said, addressing the adjutants general present. "We need to know how you can respond and all the things that you do and to see the troops in action well before that emergency response is necessary."

Heineman stressed the importance of the role the Guard plays.

"The role the National Guard is playing today is extraordinarily different than what it was 20 or 30 years ago," Heineman said. "It's amazing what you do and the training that (is provided) and the exceptional manner in which you perform those missions. It's better today than we've ever had. We don't want to go back. It's absolutely phenomenal."

Original content found here.
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

Department of the Air Force does not exercise any responsibility or oversight of the content at external link destination.

The appearance of external hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the United States Department of Defense of linked web sites or the information, products, or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and morale, welfare and recreation sites, the United States Department of Defense does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. All links are provided consistent with the mission of this web site.