USNORTHCOM, National Guard leaders: Partnerships key to domestic response

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. -- Sharing a stage Wednesday at a domestic preparedness workshop that emphasizes partnerships, the chief of the National Guard Bureau and the combatant commander of U.S. Northern Command emphasized a whole-of-government, whole-of-community approach to responding to natural or manmade disasters.

"No one person or agency can do this alone - it takes a team to meet the deservedly high expectations of our citizens," Army Gen. Charles H. Jacoby, Jr., commander of both USNORTHCOM and North American Aerospace Defense Command, told a joint audience that included representatives from NORTHCOM, the National Guard Bureau, all military components, National Guard state leaders, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and numerous other organizations.

"One of the most valuable things about the Guard is our ability to establish and maintain strong partnerships," said Air Force Gen. Craig McKinley, chief of the National Guard Bureau. "Partnerships are what make the National Guard what we are - whether it's our partnership with our parent services, ... our partnership with foreign nations in the State Partnership Program ... or our partnership with local authorities and civilians in communities across the country.

"One of the strongest and most vital partnerships the National Guard has is with [USNORTHCOM]," he said.

Adequate response to domestic disasters involves teamwork among multiple federal, state and local agencies in support of civil authorities, Jacoby said. Robust command, control, communication and collaboration also are essential, he said. The right equipment, training and preparation are crucial, he said, noting that he and other senior leaders live daily with the knowledge that any moment could bring news of a no-notice catastrophe requiring a coordinated, rapid response.

"This is especially true with respect to no-notice events such as a major earthquake. Response then is completely a function of preparedness," Jacoby said.

The 2011 fiscal year was a busy one for domestic operations and National Guard support to civil authorities, McKinley said.

There were an unusually high 14 natural disasters exceeding $1 billion in impact and the Guard's Civil Support Teams undertook 2,428 missions, he said. Hurricane Irene alone caused 56 deaths, saw extensive damage along the Eastern Seaboard and 27 states contributed to the National Guard's response.

"This is a time for partnership," McKinley said. "As we prepare for the upcoming fire and hurricane seasons, we need to engage with state and local agencies to verify their projected requirements; we need to continue readiness exercises, training with our local, state and federal response partners. This will further ensure effective interoperability and efficient integration in response to major natural disasters."
Meanwhile, the National Guard's capabilities continue to increase, he said. One example: Five of the new Homeland Response Forces now are validated, with the remaining five scheduled for certification by the end of the year.

The fiscally constrained environment means military responders must work smarter, Jacoby said.

"You know the Department of Defense is going to get a little bit smaller, right?" he said. "We also know the threats to the homeland - especially in Defense support to civil authorities - will not [get smaller]."

Fiscal constraints notwithstanding, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has said there will be no hollow force on his watch, Jacoby said. "When it comes to domestic preparedness for Title 10 units, the National Guard and Reserve, avoiding a hollow force in the homeland especially means sustaining realistic training, properly scaled exercises for our big domestic missions as well as the necessary force structure to get the job done.

"In an era of austerity, teaming is more important than ever," he said. "NORAD and USNORTHCOM have no more important DoD teammates than the National Guard.

"On the civil support side, all of us in this room are about supporting communities, and that is where our Guard members live."

The National Guard's community base is why Jacoby is a big fan of the Dual-Status Commander Program, he said.

The dual-status commander concept allows joint task force commanders responding to a domestic disaster to simultaneously command federal troops and National Guard forces in multiple duty statuses. Jacoby called the concept possibly the most important initiative taken in the area of Defense support to civil authorities in a decade.

"It harnesses DoD support in a unified way and connects it intimately to the needs and power of our communities," Jacoby said. "I am very proud that, given our first opportunity during Hurricane Irene, the memorandum of agreement signatures from governors began to flow quickly as Irene approached and four governors - North Carolina, New York, Rhode Island and New Hampshire - requested designation of an actual dual-status commander for Hurricane Irene, which Secretary Panetta approved quickly."

At least one dual-status commander has been trained for every state, territory and the District of Columbia and many have more than one, Jacoby said.

"Dual-status commanders are the keynote for the unification of military efforts," McKinley said. "Dual-status commanders provide a much-needed organizational structure for management of large National Guard and federal force packages supporting state and local authorities."
Among areas for improvement, Jacoby cited funding for Guard troops responding to domestic disasters.
"As a commander who has relied on National Guard units in combat, I am not happy when the Guard has to spend training dollars for disaster relief as they so nobly did during Irene," he said.

The generals spoke at the 2012 Domestic Preparedness Workshop here co-hosted by NORTHCOM and NGB, Feb. 22 to 24.

Original content found here.
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.